Two Articles

Assignment 2 LASA 1Analytical Summaries For this assignment, you will compose two short censorious essays explaining and evaluating arguments by other authors. This assignment allows you to analyze an have intercourse from a variety of perspectives and assess arguments for or against the issue. By centre your attention on how the original authors substance abuse inference and reasoning to construct and support their positions, you can recognize the value of critical thinking in public discourse.Read the two articles Predictive Probes, and New evidence Tells Whom a Crippling Disease Will Hitand When from the textbook and write two separate uninflected summaries. These articles can be found in the chapter titled Deciding to accept an argument Compare the evidence. This assignment has two parts. Part 1First Article Write an analytical summary of the article focusing on the articles main claims. Include the undermentioned Identify the three ways the author uses evidence to suppor t assertions. Identify the places where evidence is utilize as well as how the author uses this evidence.Discuss evidence as the reason vs. the support for the reason. Also discuss evidence as dependent on the issue/context. Analyze how the author signals this usage through elements such as word extracts, transitions, or logical connections. Part 2Second Article Write an analytical summary of the article focusing on the articles main claims. Include the following Identify the authors use of the three elements experiment, correlation, and guess to support assertions. Analyze how the author signals the use of these elements through quarrel.For example, word choices, transitions, or logical connections. Write a 45-page paper in Word format. obtain APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention LastnameFirstInitial_M3_A2. doc. 1. What kind of evidence would you expect in the following arguments? a. An argument that deal who eat a special diet will h ave less chance of getting cancer. b. An argument that God exists. c. An argument that human cells secrete some substance beneath certain conditions. d. An argument that stealing is unethical. e.An argument that owning a pet tends to lower ones blood pressure. Answers (a) evidence after the fact (b) philosophical evidence (a general principle, for instance that the universe is orderly) (c) direct scientific experimentation (d) philosophical evidence (e) evidence after the fact 2. Underline the language in the following argument that you believe indicates that it does (or does not) admit its limits. Its an obvious fact that living in the suburbs is better than city life. Everyone knows that cities are far more polluted and dangerous. And of course, people dont even know their neighbors.On the other hand, suburbs are peaceful havens from the workaday world. READINGS The following two articles show breathtaking advances in the ability to bring out whether a person will suffer from a particular genetic complaint. The first article contains references to all three types of evidence discussed in this chapter. Compare the language used to depict direct experimentation, after-the-fact evidence, and values questions. Predictive probes by Jerry E. Bishop Several years ago, Nancy Wexlers mother died of Huntingtons disease, a hereditary and always-fatal affliction that strikes in midlife.Since then, Ms. Wexler, the 38-year-old president of the Hereditary Diseases Foundation in Santa Monica, Calif. , has lived with the uncertainty of whether she, too, inherited the deadly gene. That uncertainty may soon be resolved. A few months ago, scientists announced they were on the verge of completing a new test to retrieve the gene for Huntingtons disease (formerly called Huntingtons chorea). But deciding whether to submit herself to the test is an anguishing choice for Ms. Wexler. If I came out lucky, taking the test would be terrific, of course, she says. But if I came out unl ucky, well Her dilemma is an extreme example of the kind thousands of Americans will buttock in the not-too-distant future as scientists learn how to pinpoint genes that cause or predispose a person to a future illness. The test to detect the Huntingtons disease gene should be ready within one to two years. Researchers already have detected some of the genes that can lead to premature message attacks and, in the near future, hope to spot those that could predispose a person to breast or colon cancer.Eventually, scientists believe they will be able to detect genes leading to diabetes, depression, schizophrenia and the premature senility called Alzheimers disease. New Test Tells Whom a Crippling Disease Will Hitand When Amy Jo Snider, a college senior, has put her move plans and romantic life on hold until she settles a gnawing question about her genetic legacy. During her Christmas break, the Charleston, SC, student plans to be tested for a gene that causes ataxia, a disease with out a cure that destroys the brain cells governing muscle control.The disorder crippled and ultimately killed her father in middle age. Because of a recent breakthrough in genetic research, the 21-year-old Miss Snider will be able to find out whether she inherited the disease, and, if so, how soon and how hard ataxia may strike her. I ask to be tested before I start to show symptoms, she says unflinchingly. Im graduating in May, and I have to start planning my life. As torturing as the knowledge might be, she says the uncertainty is worse. If Im in limbo, its not fair to people around me, she says. I cant deal with not knowing.