Persuading on Genetically Modified Food Essay

The article called Genetically Modified Foods, has a look that is use to grab an earreach emotion while still putting some facts. Right out in the first paragraph you will find ethos. Per Pinstrup-Anderson plays a key role in the article, he is the H. E. Babcock Professor of Food, Nutrition and Public Policy at Cornell University. Giving Per Pinstrup-Anderson a creditability, and having the audience attention. This is the only time in the article when ethos is being used to help their melody.In the beside two paragraphs, Pathos and tidings be used. It leavens some facts as well as getting into the audience emotion. The modal value this was done was by talking about helping farmers in developing countries bring forth more fodder, making it more inexpensive to buy food, as well as not harming the environment. It goes on to say, Many millions of people do not brace access to sufficient calories and many more suffer from micronutrient deficiencies. Another quote is, which avoided mass famishment and helped millions out of poverty and hunger.Notice they never gave an exact statistic on how many people ar suffering from poverty and hunger, letting the audience carry out that it is so many people affected, and not bonnie a specific number. It gives it more of a feel and so would be given an exact number. In the next paragraph it goes back to news, in the paragraph it is said science is the answer to fixing the hunger. It describes do that must be taken an order to be fitted to start helping starving people, as well as how will science help state, like drought tolerance, mitigation of negative humor channel, and pest granting immunity in crops.Those are just a few of what the paragraph claims to be able to do with a little investment for the technology. The way this paragraph is phrase is by letting the audiences see the processes that have to be done in order for an action to start. That way the audiences may start to have an opinion. At the end of this article it starts to talk about how long test must be done, and how the yearlong we wait the more expensive food will be as well as difference millions to die. This passage is using pathos for its persuasiveness. Its getting the audience that deep emotion of people waiting and starving.It goes on to say that anti-science ideology and the failure of the government brought the food crisis in the first place. This paragraph points a finger to show they are near, as well as preceding to say we have to change if something is not working. In the second article of, The Failure of Gene-Altered Crops, Vandana Shiva is presented as the ethos in this paragraph she is the recrudesce of Navdanya in India which is the movement of seed keepers and organic farmers. She written many books on how genetically modified foods are failing and how they will affect us.This grabs the audience attention because shes a strong believer on organic substance. In the next paragraph it says we need biodiversity intensification that can work with nature instead of loss against it, it doesnt give a specific details as to why. The only argument made was when Doug Gurian-Sherman of the sum of concerned scientist published a studied, Failure to Yield. In the study it is closely evaluated on the genetically modified for 20 years to see if they would increase yield or to just see infract progress.In the end it showed that the experiment failed to increase yields as well as it failed to engineer crops to be insect-resistant nor herbicide tolerance. In this paragraph it was use ethos and logos. Ethos was Doug Gurian-Sherman and his research study, Failure to Yield. Logos was the bits of facts that came from Doug Gurian-Sherman research study. In the next to paragraph, it is shown by the International Assessment of Agricultural lore and Technology for Development IAASTD has concluded that genetic engine room did not seem very promising in the future.IAASTD found that the small fa rms that based on agri-ecology would produce much more food. This paragraph had also ethos, being IAASTD. As for the logos was what IAASTD found in the 4 years on figuring out what genetic engineering could hold in the future. The article makes a lot of tactics with logos and ethos to r individually the audience, giving a coarse amount of facts from other attri alonee people. The next three paragraphs have ethos as well as logos.In the passages, the book, Soil, Not Oil is brought as an example to give that industrial monocultures are more vulnerable to climate changes since the soil kept in organic plants help keep moisture making them less likely to die in draughts. In the next passage it is brought up the false record by genetic engineering industry that its only possible to respond to climate change with modified food. Vandana Shiva made a statement on crops evolved to be better resilient to climate, as well Vandana has helped create seeds for drought resistance, and flood res istance as well as salt tolerance. This give the audience the idea that genetically modified food isnt always needed when nature can just evolve.The last two passages gets more in depth on how genetically modified food and organically produced food will take us in the future. The passage give the audience a since of the future that genetic engineer for modified food is a waste a time, it does not give a sense of food security in the future and it will cause small farmers to go dept. As for Vandana Shiva Navdanya, it is a conserving biodiversity that tries to not be wasteful in water at the same time make much more food per acre. The best article that is persuasive is the second article, The Failure of Gene-Altered Crops.The first article was very persuasive, but it never made it secure enough to make it believable that it close to happening. It produce more emotion then logic tactics, making it very hard to determine whether it is a dream that the nation wishes to reach or something that could be accomplish for the future. Great syntax on making it very emotional with pathos, but argument stance it would be weak. The first article could have been stronger if it talked about other countries that are already doing genetically modified foods.Korea has been doing genetically modified food for years, about 20 countries including the European Union, Japan, Australia and New Zealand have already a labeling system for genetically modified foods, (Hae-Yeong Kim 132). Another good point would be to bring up Matin Qaim, Vitamin A deficiency is a serious nutritional problem, causing multiple adverse health outcomes. Simulations for India show that Golden Rice could reduce related health problems significantly, preventing up to 40,000 child deaths every year. (552)In India Bt cotton plant has reduce some poverty and actually help small famers, now some in mainland China and South Africa, Bt cotton are a first-generation of genetically modified technology. As for the secon d argument, many ethos and logos were presented. One being Doug Gurian-Sherman published study on how genetic industries isnt really going anywhere, it has great facts, it was a 4 year study so it showed what was being done in long term. A lot of facts on how genetic industry is failing on making modified food was claimed, but not many on how it could do more harm as well as it would kick downstairs some small farmers for even trying to use modified seeds.The plant evolving had a great way point in Gebre Egziabher, Tewolde B( The Use of Genetically Modified Crops in cultivation and Food Production, and Their Impacts on the surroundings A Developing World Perspective) Scientists believe that species evolved from a common ancestor through competition and graphic selection. They also believe that changes in genes occur in all species owing to mutation, with the probability of mutation of each gene remaining constant under the same environment.(11) Giving this quote would remind th e audience that life has a way of fixing itself and just because the technology is here does not give scientist right to use a different approach but instead try harder to help organic farming when it has been secure food source. Cite American aesculapian Assoc. Gebre Egziabher T. The Use of Genetically Modified Crops in Agriculture and Food Production, and Their Impacts on the Environment A Developing World Perspective. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B, Soil & Plant Science serial online. December 2, 2003538-12. Available from Science & Technology Collection, Ipswich, MA.Accessed April 27, 2012. American Medical Assoc. Hae-Yeong K, Jae-Hwan K, Mi-Hwa O. Regulation and detection methods for genetically modified foods in Korea. Pure & Applied Chemistry serial online. January 201082(1)129-137. Available from Science & Technology Collection, Ipswich, MA.Accessed April 27, 2012. American Medical Assoc. Qaim M. Benefits of genetically modified crops for the poor household incom e, nutrition, and health. New Biotechnology serial online. November 30, 201027(5)552-557. Available from Science & Technology Collection, Ipswich, MA. Accessed April 27, 2012.