The case of Webster v Doe Essay Example for Free

The lesson of Webster v Doe EssayThe case of Webster v Doe deals with a case that ruled upon the balance between national security and the individual rights of an employee. It also rules on the issue of iniquitous vector sum as a result of sexual discrimination. FACTS Under the National Security Act of 1947, the manager of the CIA is empowered to terminate the employment of any employee of the CIA. The law provides that when the manager, in his discretion, perceives that an employee may pose a holy terror to the security interests of the United States he may unilaterally terminate the service of the former. In the case at hand, a former CIA employee was fired after he had openly admitted to another CIA employee that he was a homosexual. This departure was despite the fact that such(prenominal) CIA employee had received excellent and outstanding employee performance ratings. In justifying the termination, the CIA Director utter that the homosexuality of the former employee was deemed sufficient threat to the security interests of the United States. The dismissed employee soon filed suit alleging that the termination constituted a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act as well as his organic Right to Property, Liberty and Privacy.The CIA Director, on the other hand, cites that decisions made under the provisions of Section 102 of the NSA grant him such power. ISSUES 1. ) Do the provisions of the APA supersede the provisions of NSA with regard to the termination of employees? 2. ) Is the act of terminating the employment of a government activity employee based on sexual preferences in violation of the United States system, particularly the First, Fourth, Fifth and Ninth Amendments?HELD The dogmatic Court ruled that the NSA law precludes any form of judicial review for acts that are not inappropriate to the protection of a persons Constitutional Rights. In an effort to uphold the law and the routine for which it was enacted, Protection of Na tional Security, care must be taken in construing the grant of power that is provided. The CIA Director is granted considerable discretion in terminating the employment of individuals.As far as the laws on agency are concerned, the CIA Director is allowed, by law, to terminate the services of anyone deemed to be a threat to the security interests without complying with the requisites of the APA law. Matters of procedure, harmonize to the Supreme Court, cannot be taken to more important than matters of public policy and national security. However, when the acts constitute violations of the Constitution and infringe upon the constitutionally guaranteed rights of individuals, the Constitution must be understood to prevail.