Examining The Life Of Influential Leaders History Essay

Examining The life Of Influential Leaders History EssayWhat is meant by leadership? leading has been described as an influence relationship between leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that reflect their sh bed purposes (Lim Daft, 2004, p.6). Good leaders are made not born. They grow through their experiences in their life. Therefore, to examine what makes a leader, this essay is going to disc e trulyplace three different nation with their lay down as a legacy of leadership.Great Modern LeaderTun Dr. Mahathir put in Mohamad was the ivth Prime diplomatic minister of Malaysia for 22 years. He was the wantest service Prime Minister in Malaysia and also Asia who held the position from 1981 to 2003.He had a humble beginning of his life. He experience through World contend II when the Japanese invaded Malaya and the return of Britain after the war. These are among other incidents over the course of his youth which has shaped him to become a Prime Ministe r that came from a modest social background first in the country. What re all(prenominal)y made Tun Mahathir a leader?Tun Mahathir is known as a gentle populaces gentle mankind full of ideas and visionary who predicted Malaysia to become a developed country by the year 2020. In such a way, he is a man with a high openness to experience personality. During his tenure as gear up minister, he came up with more policies such as Look atomic number 99 Policy and the concept of Sogo Sosha. He developed Malaysia into a modernize land with these ideas. Moreover, peerless of the highest buildings in the world which is the Petronas Twin Towers was also his idea. Thus, he has been given the name of find of Modernisation.Another profound personality of Tun Mahathirs is his high conscientiousness. He was always an achievement oriented person. This was obvious even when he was new-fashioned where he obtained excellent results for the Cambridge School Certificate, and later in the medica l degree. As prime minister, he wanted to make Malaysia internationally recognize, so he embarked on various large scale national projects such as the production of the first national car, Proton Saga. He was so achievement driven, he ensured that all his endeavours worked out.According to Fiedlers contingency model, Tun Mahathir is a task-oriented leader. If he were given the questionnaire base on the least preferred co-worker (LPC) scale, he would be more than uses negative concepts to describe other people and places greater value on task activities than on people. For example, he described his former protg Anwar Ibrahim as an impatient man to grab power (Loh, 2009). Malaysia fluctuated between highly golden and highly unfavourable clock when Tun Mahathir still tenure as prime minister.Leader of theCivil Rights MovementMahatma Gandhi was the pre-eminent political and ideological leader ofIndia during the Indian independence movement. He had known as a simple man who wore the traditional Indiandhotiand shawl. Gandhi swore to speak thetruthand propose others to follow. Therefore, he influenced many people included important leaders and political movements. Gandhi helped free the people of India from British rule through non-violent resistance, and got his name known as the Father of the Nation in India.The most dominant trait of Gandhi was his delirious stableness personality. In his whole life, he was put into prison for many times both South Africa and India. However, no matter how many times he was imprisoned, his passion for India to independence from British never died. He was jailed for summate of 2338 days. He could give up from his goal. But, he was decided to take the suffering and worked hard without any complain.Main objective of Gandhi is to seek independence for India. During his archeozoic years in South Africa, he protested unjust laws such as discriminatory law. When he returned to India later, he began to organize many other non-viole nt protests such as the freedom of press (Fischer, 1954). Gandhi was a conscientious person. He was very persistent in ensuring that peoples rights and the laws to be fair.Based on the study of Hersey and Blanchards Situational Theory, Gandhi has taken a directly rejectpoint which was the Telling style. When he led the cud civil disobedience on salt tax, he knew the consequences of his actions. Yet, his followers were snarl insecure because they did not know what would be the results from the Salt March. Therefore, he had to excuse to his followers how it works since they had low readiness in how civil disobedience works. Then, he made the first step by selling by a pinch of salt he had made (Fischer, 1954).In the formulation of a make a motion by the labourers in Kheda, Gandhi put forward four conditions to ensure the success of the strike. In his autobiography, Gandhi wrote that he told them never to resort to violence, never to molest blacklegs, never depend upon alms, and to remain firm, no matter how long the strike continued (Gandhi, 2005, p. 392). This incident shows that even the need for a strike or protest, violence is not the behaviour of Gandhi. Hence, he was a usage model of the ethical leader.One of the factors that led to the success of Gandhi was that he had the prospect to be exposed to gain new experiences and knowledge. He began to read unearthly books when he studied law in London. He had personally experienced discriminatory criteria that, as a coloured man, he did not strike the luxury to sit in the first class coach of a train in South Africa. This is one of the incidents that made Gandhi to be a better person and it led to the beginning of his pursuit of fairness in the law (Gandhi, 2005).Legacy of Courage LeaderJohn FitzgeraldKennedy was the35th prexy of the get together States, serving from 1961 untilhis assassinationin 1963. He was the commander of armed services service during World War II in the South Pacific. later o n he came back from the war, he desires to turn into political. As President of the join States, Kennedy was the only president has won the Pulitzer Prize.Kennedy had a strong emotional constancy personality which was evident during the Cuban Missile crisis in 1962. It was the time that the Soviet missiles under construction in Cuba. Next step of Kennedy was crucial because it whitethorn lead to nuclear war between the Soviet Union and the United States. Anyhow, Kennedy did not make any invasion of Cuba such as drastic measures but he spent more diplomatic stance with them. pensive insightsI realized that all leaders no matter what of their washing and religion are distinctive in their identity. Their degree of dominance in personality is differentiating them from others. In addition, it seems that the dominant personality will always stand out such as Mahathirs openness to experience and even Gandhis emotional st exponent.Next, the simplicity of contingency theories is difficult to explain all the variables because in each theory are always shortage in certain areas. It cannot amply explain the effectiveness of leadership in the ideal situation.On the other hand, comparing the personal qualities of purely rational versus ethical leaders is one of the problems.ConclusionLeadership is not easy to achieve. Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamed, Mahatma Gandhi and Bill Clinton are all great leaders. So, what makes a leader? For me, leader means an individual with ability to solve problems at first and requires a lot of patience and excess characteristics.